A multi-level intervention in worksites to increase fruit and vegetable access and intake: Rationale, design and methods of the 'Good to Go' cluster randomized trial.

Center for Health Equity Research, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Epidemiology, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Electronic address: patricia_risica@brown.edu. Center for Health Equity Research, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA. Currently with Department of Surgery, Columbia University Medical Center, NY, New York 10032, USA. Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA. Center for Health Equity Research, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Behavioral and Social Sciences, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, RI 02912, USA; Department of Human Development and Family Studies, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA; Institute for Collaboration on Health, Intervention, and Policy, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA.

Contemporary clinical trials. 2018;:87-98
Full text from:

Abstract

BACKGROUND Fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption is an important contributor to chronic disease prevention. However, most Americans do not eat adequate amounts. The worksite is an advantageous setting to reach large, diverse segments of the population with interventions to increase F&V intake, but research gaps exist. No studies have evaluated the implementation of mobile F&V markets at worksites nor compared the effectiveness of such markets with or without nutrition education. METHODS This paper describes the protocol for Good to Go (GTG), a cluster randomized trial to evaluate F&V intake change in employees from worksites randomized into three experimental arms: discount, fresh F&V markets (Access Only arm); markets plus educational components including campaigns, cooking demonstrations, videos, newsletters, and a web site (Access Plus arm); and an attention placebo comparison intervention on physical activity and stress reduction (Comparison). Secondary aims include: 1) Process evaluation to determine costs, reach, fidelity, and dose as well as the relationship of these variables with changes in F&V intake; 2) Applying a mediating variable framework to examine relationships of psychosocial factors/determinants with changes in F&V consumption; and 3) Cost effectiveness analysis of the different intervention arms. DISCUSSION The GTG study will fill important research gaps in the field by implementing a rigorous cluster randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of an innovative environmental intervention providing access and availability to F&V at the worksite and whether this access intervention is further enhanced by accompanying educational interventions. GTG will provide an important contribution to public health research and practice. Trial registration number NCT02729675, ClinicalTrials.gov.